<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Banned words of 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: constance</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-10435</link>
		<dc:creator>constance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-10435</guid>
		<description>Gwen, I found out that &quot;conversate&quot; is not used to mean converse or communicate.  It has a particular application as a build up for a sexual encounter.  You conversate as a prelude to a one night stand, usually with a complete stranger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwen, I found out that &#8220;conversate&#8221; is not used to mean converse or communicate.  It has a particular application as a build up for a sexual encounter.  You conversate as a prelude to a one night stand, usually with a complete stranger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim t</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-9863</link>
		<dc:creator>jim t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-9863</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;bring&quot; when they mean &quot;take&quot;, as in &quot;We advise you to bring your cat to the vet to be spayed.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;bring&#8221; when they mean &#8220;take&#8221;, as in &#8220;We advise you to bring your cat to the vet to be spayed.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-6032</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 00:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-6032</guid>
		<description>How about the words, &quot;reinterate&quot; for reiterate, &quot;supposably&quot; for supposedly, and &quot;conversate&quot; for conversation or communicate or communication?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the words, &#8220;reinterate&#8221; for reiterate, &#8220;supposably&#8221; for supposedly, and &#8220;conversate&#8221; for conversation or communicate or communication?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-5815</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-5815</guid>
		<description>How about awesome.  I hate that word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about awesome.  I hate that word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-5711</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 04:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-5711</guid>
		<description>Great and witty response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great and witty response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-5635</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-5635</guid>
		<description>How about a limit on the percentage of times the word, “like,” can be used?  Like, you know how, like, young people use &quot;like&quot;?  Like, this, like, really bothers me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a limit on the percentage of times the word, “like,” can be used?  Like, you know how, like, young people use &#8220;like&#8221;?  Like, this, like, really bothers me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-5255</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-5255</guid>
		<description>All great suggestions! I would also like to add the following to the list:
&quot;My bad&quot; - have hated this from the first time I heard it
&quot;Human Capital&quot; - very degrading and dehumanizing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All great suggestions! I would also like to add the following to the list:<br />
&#8220;My bad&#8221; &#8211; have hated this from the first time I heard it<br />
&#8220;Human Capital&#8221; &#8211; very degrading and dehumanizing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molly</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-5014</link>
		<dc:creator>Molly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-5014</guid>
		<description>Everyone in my office says things are &quot;HILARIOUS!&quot;  No, usually not.  Overused to the point that it&#039;s completely lost its meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone in my office says things are &#8220;HILARIOUS!&#8221;  No, usually not.  Overused to the point that it&#8217;s completely lost its meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-2#comment-4981</link>
		<dc:creator>gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4981</guid>
		<description>This has probably come up previously (I certainly hope so!) but the use of &quot;fun&quot; as in &quot;that was so fun&quot;, still drives me up the wall!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has probably come up previously (I certainly hope so!) but the use of &#8220;fun&#8221; as in &#8220;that was so fun&#8221;, still drives me up the wall!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janie</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4806</link>
		<dc:creator>Janie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4806</guid>
		<description>Nouns indiscriminately turned into verbs because someone thinks this sounds cute or catchy, e.g. let me noodle on that (translation: let me think about that).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nouns indiscriminately turned into verbs because someone thinks this sounds cute or catchy, e.g. let me noodle on that (translation: let me think about that).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4783</link>
		<dc:creator>S Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4783</guid>
		<description>Really? The renewed and constant use of &quot;Really?&quot; didn&#039;t make the banned list?

Anyways, that&#039;s AMAZING. 

Good list, great comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really? The renewed and constant use of &#8220;Really?&#8221; didn&#8217;t make the banned list?</p>
<p>Anyways, that&#8217;s AMAZING. </p>
<p>Good list, great comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4776</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4776</guid>
		<description>&quot;now more than ever&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;now more than ever&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>C Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4766</guid>
		<description>I heard the term &quot;vetting, vetted&quot; etc. about every 5 minutes during the prelude to the November election, and had never heard it before that. I hope to never hear it again. Surely some other term was used before this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard the term &#8220;vetting, vetted&#8221; etc. about every 5 minutes during the prelude to the November election, and had never heard it before that. I hope to never hear it again. Surely some other term was used before this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Chancey</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Chancey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>Going forward, please ban &quot;going forward&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going forward, please ban &#8220;going forward&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Goldfain</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Goldfain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>The phrase I&#039;m hearing a lot lately that seems to be just filler is:

      &quot;... that being said ...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrase I&#8217;m hearing a lot lately that seems to be just filler is:</p>
<p>      &#8220;&#8230; that being said &#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>Please include the word AMAZING. It has truly lost it&#039;s punch because of it&#039;s over use.
The other phrase that annoys me is the word &#039;connection&#039; like &quot;I knew we had a connection&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please include the word AMAZING. It has truly lost it&#8217;s punch because of it&#8217;s over use.<br />
The other phrase that annoys me is the word &#8216;connection&#8217; like &#8220;I knew we had a connection&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Segerson</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4748</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Segerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4748</guid>
		<description>My favorite to be included in the next list of banned words is, &quot;what not&quot; - who came up with that phrase anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite to be included in the next list of banned words is, &#8220;what not&#8221; &#8211; who came up with that phrase anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatima Parsons</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4746</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatima Parsons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4746</guid>
		<description>Please include this word on the word banishment list. &quot;anyways&quot; I don&#039;t understand how and why it is used. It it a pain to the ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please include this word on the word banishment list. &#8220;anyways&#8221; I don&#8217;t understand how and why it is used. It it a pain to the ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam Shafer</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/banned-words-of-2010/comment-page-1#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam Shafer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3223#comment-4741</guid>
		<description>What about the over-used phrases &quot;reach across the aisle&quot; and the analogy of what happens on Wall St (or elsewhere) vs Main St.   Please.... enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the over-used phrases &#8220;reach across the aisle&#8221; and the analogy of what happens on Wall St (or elsewhere) vs Main St.   Please&#8230;. enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.higheredmorning.com @ 2012-02-08 05:19:56 -->
