<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Bing the next Google?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nora Tsay</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google/comment-page-1#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Nora Tsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=463#comment-632</guid>
		<description>I have used &quot;Bing&quot; for quite a few times by now and find it easy to use and very informative and decision making is easier with Bing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used &#8220;Bing&#8221; for quite a few times by now and find it easy to use and very informative and decision making is easier with Bing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyn Kelley</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google/comment-page-1#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyn Kelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=463#comment-624</guid>
		<description>I like a lot about Bing - the organization, the looks, searching for file types.  Finding images is easier than Google because they fit so many more on a page, but the images could load a wee bit faster. I&#039;m not sure why anyone would say they &quot;hate&quot; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like a lot about Bing &#8211; the organization, the looks, searching for file types.  Finding images is easier than Google because they fit so many more on a page, but the images could load a wee bit faster. I&#8217;m not sure why anyone would say they &#8220;hate&#8221; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaryAnne</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google/comment-page-1#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>MaryAnne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=463#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Love it! Much more informative, easier to read and find what I am looking for. Not cluttered with stuff! Seems to have more valuable information readily available. Go Bing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love it! Much more informative, easier to read and find what I am looking for. Not cluttered with stuff! Seems to have more valuable information readily available. Go Bing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google/comment-page-1#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=463#comment-582</guid>
		<description>Bing seems to use different weighting algorithms to determine its results.  It&#039;s just different than Google - not easy to spot pages that are trying to raise their hit count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing seems to use different weighting algorithms to determine its results.  It&#8217;s just different than Google &#8211; not easy to spot pages that are trying to raise their hit count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timporary Bowers</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google/comment-page-1#comment-547</link>
		<dc:creator>Timporary Bowers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=463#comment-547</guid>
		<description>Bing has much more visual appeal, seems better organized, and more accessible.  Difficult to tell which page may have more useful or relevant information</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing has much more visual appeal, seems better organized, and more accessible.  Difficult to tell which page may have more useful or relevant information</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google/comment-page-1#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=463#comment-539</guid>
		<description>I HATE IT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HATE IT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-bing-the-next-google/comment-page-1#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=463#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Yes and I do not like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and I do not like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.higheredmorning.com @ 2012-02-08 05:50:55 -->
