<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it OK to use race in admissions? Court says yes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Wedes</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-8#comment-5683</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Wedes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-5683</guid>
		<description>After that lecture on composition and clarity I ended my statement with &quot;more than one Justice slept thought Comp 100&quot; when I meant &quot;slept through&quot;. 
i love my own irony.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After that lecture on composition and clarity I ended my statement with &#8220;more than one Justice slept thought Comp 100&#8243; when I meant &#8220;slept through&#8221;.<br />
i love my own irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Wedes</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-8#comment-5682</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Wedes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 01:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-5682</guid>
		<description>HigherEdMorning wrote:

 &quot;When is a public university’s student body diverse enough? When it has a &#039;critical mass&#039; of minority   students — that is, enough to &#039;assure educational benefits deriving from diversity,&#039;  the court said.&quot;

Critical mass? Is that like a self-sustaining Eucharist rite at the Catholic Church? Or maybe they mean people have to think outside the box in order to gain synergy so that an action item does not drink the Kool Aid and thereafter be viewed as having no more value than lipstick on a pig.

That the ruling is to &#039;assure educational benefits deriving from diversity,&#039; is equally as obfuscating, and hints of being stereotypical. 

However one feels about this ruling is beyond my discussion. I am not even an English professor and I cringe at the way they try to logically work through a problem.

I can appreciate the vague structure of federal laws sent to states for clarification, but based on these statements (and they may be anecdotal) I think the court gave the impression of deciding on a matter but actually returned the complaint back to the sender, unopened.

I can understand why lawyers have problems with Latin but, based on this sample, it appears that more than one Justice slept thought Comp 100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HigherEdMorning wrote:</p>
<p> &#8220;When is a public university’s student body diverse enough? When it has a &#8216;critical mass&#8217; of minority   students — that is, enough to &#8216;assure educational benefits deriving from diversity,&#8217;  the court said.&#8221;</p>
<p>Critical mass? Is that like a self-sustaining Eucharist rite at the Catholic Church? Or maybe they mean people have to think outside the box in order to gain synergy so that an action item does not drink the Kool Aid and thereafter be viewed as having no more value than lipstick on a pig.</p>
<p>That the ruling is to &#8216;assure educational benefits deriving from diversity,&#8217; is equally as obfuscating, and hints of being stereotypical. </p>
<p>However one feels about this ruling is beyond my discussion. I am not even an English professor and I cringe at the way they try to logically work through a problem.</p>
<p>I can appreciate the vague structure of federal laws sent to states for clarification, but based on these statements (and they may be anecdotal) I think the court gave the impression of deciding on a matter but actually returned the complaint back to the sender, unopened.</p>
<p>I can understand why lawyers have problems with Latin but, based on this sample, it appears that more than one Justice slept thought Comp 100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-8#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Race based admissions policies are inherently racist. This can be seen in the rationale used to justify them. Only someone who believes that individuals from certain races are inferior to individuals from other races would suggest that race based admissions processes must be employed to ensure that the supposedly inferior races are represented in sufficient numbers. Only a racist would believe that uniform standards would exclude members of certain races.&lt;&lt;

You had m,e until you introduced this straw man.  Race-[based admission policies are based on the belief that race per se does not signify a difference in ability, but that it may have deprived an applicant of full educational opportunity.  Only a realist will understand that uniform standards will exclude worthy candidates who have been deprived of that opportunity.

All of which is irrelevant to the original discussion, which was about the idea that having a diverse student body was valuable as a part of the education of all students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Race based admissions policies are inherently racist. This can be seen in the rationale used to justify them. Only someone who believes that individuals from certain races are inferior to individuals from other races would suggest that race based admissions processes must be employed to ensure that the supposedly inferior races are represented in sufficient numbers. Only a racist would believe that uniform standards would exclude members of certain races.&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>You had m,e until you introduced this straw man.  Race-[based admission policies are based on the belief that race per se does not signify a difference in ability, but that it may have deprived an applicant of full educational opportunity.  Only a realist will understand that uniform standards will exclude worthy candidates who have been deprived of that opportunity.</p>
<p>All of which is irrelevant to the original discussion, which was about the idea that having a diverse student body was valuable as a part of the education of all students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-8#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course using skin color is wrong since some people might be white but come from countries where there ancestors were slaves and other people might be black but could be coming from very wealthy families in Africa.&quot;

Whether someone&#039;s ancestors were slaves, slave owners, or none of the above, is patently irrelevant.  Wrongdoing is not hereditary.  Neither is victimhood.  My grandmother was the victim of rape.  Does that make me a victim of rape as well?  Should the grandchildren of her rapist be required to bow and scrape before me?  Should they be required to give up a job or a placement at a good school to me or other members of my family?

In truth, everyone alive is the descendant of slaves.  It doesn&#039;t matter which continent your heritage can be traced to either.  Slavery has existed in every corner of the world at one time or another.  It is only in modern times that it has been largely (but not completely) eradicated.

Race based discrimination is wrong.  It doesn&#039;t matter which racial group is given preferential treatment and which group gets the short end of the stick.  It is wrong in all its forms.  It is wrong when a white person is given a job on the basis of their skin color.  It is wrong when a black person is given a job on the basis of their skin color.  It is wrong when Asian students or Jewish students are held to a higher standard in terms of their grades or SAT scores when applying to a university.  It is wrong when standards are lowered for black or latino students.  

Race based admissions policies are inherently racist.  This can be seen in the rationale used to justify them.  Only someone who believes that individuals from certain races are inferior to individuals from other races would suggest that race based admissions processes must be employed to ensure that the supposedly inferior races are represented in sufficient numbers.  Only a racist would believe that uniform standards would exclude members of certain races.  

It is the condescending sort of racism that says to those it is directed against: &quot;I know you&#039;re not strong enough, smart enough, or of good enough character to succeed, so I&#039;m going to be nice and give you a pass just to show much sympathy I have for people like you.&quot;  It is KKK with good manners racism.  It does a vast disservice to everyone of every creed and color who succeeded because they possessed the talent and determination to achieve their goals without special treatment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of course using skin color is wrong since some people might be white but come from countries where there ancestors were slaves and other people might be black but could be coming from very wealthy families in Africa.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whether someone&#8217;s ancestors were slaves, slave owners, or none of the above, is patently irrelevant.  Wrongdoing is not hereditary.  Neither is victimhood.  My grandmother was the victim of rape.  Does that make me a victim of rape as well?  Should the grandchildren of her rapist be required to bow and scrape before me?  Should they be required to give up a job or a placement at a good school to me or other members of my family?</p>
<p>In truth, everyone alive is the descendant of slaves.  It doesn&#8217;t matter which continent your heritage can be traced to either.  Slavery has existed in every corner of the world at one time or another.  It is only in modern times that it has been largely (but not completely) eradicated.</p>
<p>Race based discrimination is wrong.  It doesn&#8217;t matter which racial group is given preferential treatment and which group gets the short end of the stick.  It is wrong in all its forms.  It is wrong when a white person is given a job on the basis of their skin color.  It is wrong when a black person is given a job on the basis of their skin color.  It is wrong when Asian students or Jewish students are held to a higher standard in terms of their grades or SAT scores when applying to a university.  It is wrong when standards are lowered for black or latino students.  </p>
<p>Race based admissions policies are inherently racist.  This can be seen in the rationale used to justify them.  Only someone who believes that individuals from certain races are inferior to individuals from other races would suggest that race based admissions processes must be employed to ensure that the supposedly inferior races are represented in sufficient numbers.  Only a racist would believe that uniform standards would exclude members of certain races.  </p>
<p>It is the condescending sort of racism that says to those it is directed against: &#8220;I know you&#8217;re not strong enough, smart enough, or of good enough character to succeed, so I&#8217;m going to be nice and give you a pass just to show much sympathy I have for people like you.&#8221;  It is KKK with good manners racism.  It does a vast disservice to everyone of every creed and color who succeeded because they possessed the talent and determination to achieve their goals without special treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-8#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 01:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>This is a strange story. I though Supreme Court has already decided that using skin color as a factor in admissions is illegal. Is it not right?

Of course using skin color is wrong since some people might be white but come from countries where there ancestors were slaves and other people might be black but could be coming from very wealthy families in Africa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a strange story. I though Supreme Court has already decided that using skin color as a factor in admissions is illegal. Is it not right?</p>
<p>Of course using skin color is wrong since some people might be white but come from countries where there ancestors were slaves and other people might be black but could be coming from very wealthy families in Africa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-8#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>No, this is not OK! This is horrible. 

Discrimination against people of European descent is so common now, it seems the government takes a course on a slow extermination of White people. 

White people should try to get a Homeland for themselves, to stop this ongoing genocide and suppression. Jews could get a Jewish Homeland (Israel). European Americans should follow their example and create a White People Homeland, to stop such discrimination and genocide.

These days it seems practically impossible to have any organization on campus, which would stand for the interests of European Americans. Others races get such organization routinely, and even get funding from colleges and universities. If this is not racism, then what racism is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, this is not OK! This is horrible. </p>
<p>Discrimination against people of European descent is so common now, it seems the government takes a course on a slow extermination of White people. </p>
<p>White people should try to get a Homeland for themselves, to stop this ongoing genocide and suppression. Jews could get a Jewish Homeland (Israel). European Americans should follow their example and create a White People Homeland, to stop such discrimination and genocide.</p>
<p>These days it seems practically impossible to have any organization on campus, which would stand for the interests of European Americans. Others races get such organization routinely, and even get funding from colleges and universities. If this is not racism, then what racism is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kay S DeLoach</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-8#comment-1839</link>
		<dc:creator>Kay S DeLoach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1839</guid>
		<description>Hi, isn&#039;t ironic that what MLK said (his dream that all were judged by the character within) does not mean that much to the blacks.  They now want to be judged by the color of their skin.  If the admissions department judged by everything except race would that not still get them their diverse population?  It is like our president Obama, people want to label him the Black President, he is not; he is simply our President just like all of the others. Only when we stop with these labels will and everyone wants to be judged by the character within will we be race free.  BUT of course that is only if everyone understands what &quot;character&quot; means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, isn&#8217;t ironic that what MLK said (his dream that all were judged by the character within) does not mean that much to the blacks.  They now want to be judged by the color of their skin.  If the admissions department judged by everything except race would that not still get them their diverse population?  It is like our president Obama, people want to label him the Black President, he is not; he is simply our President just like all of the others. Only when we stop with these labels will and everyone wants to be judged by the character within will we be race free.  BUT of course that is only if everyone understands what &#8220;character&#8221; means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1837</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1837</guid>
		<description>Kim R. - I also work at a University. Are you implying that students are being recruited for College and don&#039;t want to go but want the money?? 
 
The Pell grants/loans are sent directly to the school and applied to a students tuition costs. If a student receiving Financial aid drops a course(s) and his/her credit hours fall below Full-time student status, Financial services is notified. The student should  get credited an amount that he or she paid BUT that student does not get one cent of the &quot;financial aid&quot; money. In fact this year in my department one student who qualified for financial aid dropped out of a required course and fell below 9 credit hours, making her status part-time. She tried to keep her FT status (financial aid) by taking a non related course and was denied future Financial aid.

I think this is off the point of discussion about if race should be a determination for admission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim R. &#8211; I also work at a University. Are you implying that students are being recruited for College and don&#8217;t want to go but want the money?? </p>
<p>The Pell grants/loans are sent directly to the school and applied to a students tuition costs. If a student receiving Financial aid drops a course(s) and his/her credit hours fall below Full-time student status, Financial services is notified. The student should  get credited an amount that he or she paid BUT that student does not get one cent of the &#8220;financial aid&#8221; money. In fact this year in my department one student who qualified for financial aid dropped out of a required course and fell below 9 credit hours, making her status part-time. She tried to keep her FT status (financial aid) by taking a non related course and was denied future Financial aid.</p>
<p>I think this is off the point of discussion about if race should be a determination for admission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Pinstin</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Pinstin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mary V.  I read your post and I was thinking we are really on the same page :-).  I echo your remarks on considering other things such as volunteerism, etc...I just don&#039;t think race, religion should be a factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mary V.  I read your post and I was thinking we are really on the same page <img src='http://www.higheredmorning.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  I echo your remarks on considering other things such as volunteerism, etc&#8230;I just don&#8217;t think race, religion should be a factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim R</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>Why is it that most people don&#039;t consider racism against whites? You do NOT have to be white to be a racist. 

I teach at a college and it seems that we recruit/accept many students who don&#039;t really want an education. Many of our students quit coming to class after they receive their pell grant check refunds/loans/etc. 

Why can&#039;t we look at each perspective student&#039;s application without looking at their color? 
I think it should only be based on grades, ACT scores, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it that most people don&#8217;t consider racism against whites? You do NOT have to be white to be a racist. </p>
<p>I teach at a college and it seems that we recruit/accept many students who don&#8217;t really want an education. Many of our students quit coming to class after they receive their pell grant check refunds/loans/etc. </p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t we look at each perspective student&#8217;s application without looking at their color?<br />
I think it should only be based on grades, ACT scores, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary V</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1758</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1758</guid>
		<description>Sorry &#039;bout that Barry.  You exemplified the very example I am oppose to and in rereading what you meant to say, it sounds like you are in agreement.  All things being said, the colleges and universities who only accept basing their criteria on grades, scores and race and the losers in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8217;bout that Barry.  You exemplified the very example I am oppose to and in rereading what you meant to say, it sounds like you are in agreement.  All things being said, the colleges and universities who only accept basing their criteria on grades, scores and race and the losers in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary V</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>I disagree with Barry Pinstin.  No two prospects are exactly alike except for race being the difference. No two prospects come with the SAME exact experience in school, volunteerism, and ability to communicate.  If Higher Ed judges two Prospects to be exactly the SAME but for race and ethnicity, then they are not asking the correct questions, nor interviewing extensively, and looking into the past experience of the candidate for clues into the future performance of that candidate. 
There is always something unique about a person that would fit one Institution of Higher Ed over another.  For instance if two candidates had applications in the School of Forestry at Yale University and both they were very promising scholars but for one difference:  one volunteered in reforestation for two summers in Washington State and the other volunteered 4 summers in a row in developing local shared community vegetable gardens.  Which one would you pick that would speak to the direction of the Dept of Forestry?  It&#039;s clear that one is more non-profit driven, while the other has gained a more global view of the earth&#039;s resources.  The proof is not creating diversity through choosing color, but by choosing the best fit.  

Myt background is Irish-Italian and I&#039;m a mother of part African children. I want them to be judged, especially by Higher Ed, by their character, experiences, how they resolved their issues/mistakes, what they have offered to their community, volunteerism, and by their achievement in school and their command over communication and experience in public speaking.  

I work at an esteemed private liberal arts college with a thrust, almost with hubris, toward diversity.  I live day by day watching what happens when students are chosen to bring the numbers up.  They feel segregated, thrust into small &quot;workshops&quot; with black-only students for separate Orientations. The anger that has come out of our students simmers beneath the quite waters of a school constantly pushing the numbers higher and higher.  These students feel that they should not be treated any differently than their peers, and every day that are reminded that they are differently treated then their peers.

I think all of us who care for one side or the other on this hot topic have been impacted one way or another.  I&#039;m either impacted or witness every day of my life what it is like to be judged by race.  We are all inherently racist.  And the ones who livid in reading that comment, are the ones who judge without cognizance of their own thoughts and actions.  

Once higher ed does more to attract diversity based on future promise and past experience, not race, the institutions will see that their body of students will become diverse.  

The other side of that is the high schools from which diversity shall come.  That&#039;s a tough one to just answer in a brief response here.  Many our nation&#039;s poor school districts do not have the experience or knowledge to provide the support necessary to take children under their wing and coach them through school, studies, communication, volunteerism, and into higher ed.  Parents must take a large chunk of that role.  It&#039;s complicated, though, and fodder for another discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Barry Pinstin.  No two prospects are exactly alike except for race being the difference. No two prospects come with the SAME exact experience in school, volunteerism, and ability to communicate.  If Higher Ed judges two Prospects to be exactly the SAME but for race and ethnicity, then they are not asking the correct questions, nor interviewing extensively, and looking into the past experience of the candidate for clues into the future performance of that candidate.<br />
There is always something unique about a person that would fit one Institution of Higher Ed over another.  For instance if two candidates had applications in the School of Forestry at Yale University and both they were very promising scholars but for one difference:  one volunteered in reforestation for two summers in Washington State and the other volunteered 4 summers in a row in developing local shared community vegetable gardens.  Which one would you pick that would speak to the direction of the Dept of Forestry?  It&#8217;s clear that one is more non-profit driven, while the other has gained a more global view of the earth&#8217;s resources.  The proof is not creating diversity through choosing color, but by choosing the best fit.  </p>
<p>Myt background is Irish-Italian and I&#8217;m a mother of part African children. I want them to be judged, especially by Higher Ed, by their character, experiences, how they resolved their issues/mistakes, what they have offered to their community, volunteerism, and by their achievement in school and their command over communication and experience in public speaking.  </p>
<p>I work at an esteemed private liberal arts college with a thrust, almost with hubris, toward diversity.  I live day by day watching what happens when students are chosen to bring the numbers up.  They feel segregated, thrust into small &#8220;workshops&#8221; with black-only students for separate Orientations. The anger that has come out of our students simmers beneath the quite waters of a school constantly pushing the numbers higher and higher.  These students feel that they should not be treated any differently than their peers, and every day that are reminded that they are differently treated then their peers.</p>
<p>I think all of us who care for one side or the other on this hot topic have been impacted one way or another.  I&#8217;m either impacted or witness every day of my life what it is like to be judged by race.  We are all inherently racist.  And the ones who livid in reading that comment, are the ones who judge without cognizance of their own thoughts and actions.  </p>
<p>Once higher ed does more to attract diversity based on future promise and past experience, not race, the institutions will see that their body of students will become diverse.  </p>
<p>The other side of that is the high schools from which diversity shall come.  That&#8217;s a tough one to just answer in a brief response here.  Many our nation&#8217;s poor school districts do not have the experience or knowledge to provide the support necessary to take children under their wing and coach them through school, studies, communication, volunteerism, and into higher ed.  Parents must take a large chunk of that role.  It&#8217;s complicated, though, and fodder for another discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alvin R.</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1743</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1743</guid>
		<description>I think that the use of race is still a necessity, if we are serious about educating all people.  It is unfortunate that it has to be used at all, but due to the historically ingrained use of white privilege throughout our society, I believe it is a necessity.  We can easily see from the response of our society generally and education specifically, that many believe that since the election of President Obama, that we are now living in a &quot;post-racial&quot; America.  His election was just that, an election.  I believe it was &quot;a&quot; major step, however, the systems in place that discriminate did not change on November 4th.  If anything I believe they became more exposed.  Each institution, I believe, needs to determine if race needs to be a factor.  There are a few schools that are doing better in the admissions area in terms of admitting diverse students.  The problem of retention and graduation still remains.  To me, the real issue is not who gets in, but who graduates and transitions into society as a productive contributing citizen.  Admission really is the small piece, but if our students cannot compete and complete, many become relegated to the lower classes of society.  We need to work harder to make sure they complete and graduate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the use of race is still a necessity, if we are serious about educating all people.  It is unfortunate that it has to be used at all, but due to the historically ingrained use of white privilege throughout our society, I believe it is a necessity.  We can easily see from the response of our society generally and education specifically, that many believe that since the election of President Obama, that we are now living in a &#8220;post-racial&#8221; America.  His election was just that, an election.  I believe it was &#8220;a&#8221; major step, however, the systems in place that discriminate did not change on November 4th.  If anything I believe they became more exposed.  Each institution, I believe, needs to determine if race needs to be a factor.  There are a few schools that are doing better in the admissions area in terms of admitting diverse students.  The problem of retention and graduation still remains.  To me, the real issue is not who gets in, but who graduates and transitions into society as a productive contributing citizen.  Admission really is the small piece, but if our students cannot compete and complete, many become relegated to the lower classes of society.  We need to work harder to make sure they complete and graduate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony P.</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1728</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1728</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a real but unspoken issue: We should not think for a moment that the wisdom of one man wearing black robes is somehow superior to that of all others.  Good intent is does not create goodness.  The comments posted by Don H. exemplifies the law of unintended consequences. Kudos to those speaking out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a real but unspoken issue: We should not think for a moment that the wisdom of one man wearing black robes is somehow superior to that of all others.  Good intent is does not create goodness.  The comments posted by Don H. exemplifies the law of unintended consequences. Kudos to those speaking out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reginal Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator>Reginal Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1725</guid>
		<description>I think the fair thing would be to alternate races each term.  Start with taking all blacks, then all whites, then all asians, then all latinos, etc...Then start over and repeat.  This is pretty fair and folks would know to only apply during the accepting of applications for their race.  If enrollments are low for a particular race that term, go to the next race on the list and so on until enrollment limits are reached.

Sound good?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the fair thing would be to alternate races each term.  Start with taking all blacks, then all whites, then all asians, then all latinos, etc&#8230;Then start over and repeat.  This is pretty fair and folks would know to only apply during the accepting of applications for their race.  If enrollments are low for a particular race that term, go to the next race on the list and so on until enrollment limits are reached.</p>
<p>Sound good?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don H</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>Don H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>The answer should, of course, be no.  I&#039;ve sat on enrollment and diversity boards for nearly 40 years, which is when affirmative action policities became transparent to me.  I would argue that diversity and affirmative action principles have caused more damage and more anger and more discrimination than any policy ever instituted by universities.  I&#039;ve also seen students, who, after more than 5 years of hard work and enormous hardship leading up to the PhD, be denied employment - permanently within the academic commuity - because of their (white) race (?).  I&#039;ve never understood why, for example, 2 Hispanics make us more diverse than, say, someone who&#039;s Irish and one who&#039;s Greek.
     I&#039;ve also asked, repeatedly, when affirmative action ends.  And the answer is never.  Our courts, misguided as they are, are the last hope to end this nonsense and destructive policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer should, of course, be no.  I&#8217;ve sat on enrollment and diversity boards for nearly 40 years, which is when affirmative action policities became transparent to me.  I would argue that diversity and affirmative action principles have caused more damage and more anger and more discrimination than any policy ever instituted by universities.  I&#8217;ve also seen students, who, after more than 5 years of hard work and enormous hardship leading up to the PhD, be denied employment &#8211; permanently within the academic commuity &#8211; because of their (white) race (?).  I&#8217;ve never understood why, for example, 2 Hispanics make us more diverse than, say, someone who&#8217;s Irish and one who&#8217;s Greek.<br />
     I&#8217;ve also asked, repeatedly, when affirmative action ends.  And the answer is never.  Our courts, misguided as they are, are the last hope to end this nonsense and destructive policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DanielC</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-7#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>DanielC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>How do the two white students determine that they were descriminated against?  When deciding who will be admitted to an institution it has never been some airtight formula or even a strict she has the highest entrance exam score, he has the next highest and so on down the line until the cutoff.   How do you determine who got in in your rightful spot (you don&#039;t have a rightful spot).  Is there an absolute way of determining who got in unfairly over someone else when the decision is as fuzzy as admissions can be in a large pool of reasonable candidates.  The issue is whether a school has the right to deviate from strict test scores and grade point averages and bring in other considerations to get the ideal diverse group that they want.  I say yes, there is nothing that says the school is required to pick you just because your SAT score was two or three points better than this other person.  Too many people look at this as if a school should be compelled to look at only test and grade achievement.  Well they are not and they don&#039;t, that is life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do the two white students determine that they were descriminated against?  When deciding who will be admitted to an institution it has never been some airtight formula or even a strict she has the highest entrance exam score, he has the next highest and so on down the line until the cutoff.   How do you determine who got in in your rightful spot (you don&#8217;t have a rightful spot).  Is there an absolute way of determining who got in unfairly over someone else when the decision is as fuzzy as admissions can be in a large pool of reasonable candidates.  The issue is whether a school has the right to deviate from strict test scores and grade point averages and bring in other considerations to get the ideal diverse group that they want.  I say yes, there is nothing that says the school is required to pick you just because your SAT score was two or three points better than this other person.  Too many people look at this as if a school should be compelled to look at only test and grade achievement.  Well they are not and they don&#8217;t, that is life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>Not everyone &quot;White&quot; grows up in middle income or better -So why this generalization that everyone &quot;white&quot; is automatically better off?? 

Race should not be a consideration for college admission --If a student has good grades, no matter who they are, there will be opportunities for them to proceed to college. Students (no matter background or ethnicity) from the start of High school need to be encouraged to work as hard as possible on their education. 

Every college has different standards for admission - starting with GPA, SAT and or ACT scores. Are we going to argue that is discriminating against students too??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone &#8220;White&#8221; grows up in middle income or better -So why this generalization that everyone &#8220;white&#8221; is automatically better off?? </p>
<p>Race should not be a consideration for college admission &#8211;If a student has good grades, no matter who they are, there will be opportunities for them to proceed to college. Students (no matter background or ethnicity) from the start of High school need to be encouraged to work as hard as possible on their education. </p>
<p>Every college has different standards for admission &#8211; starting with GPA, SAT and or ACT scores. Are we going to argue that is discriminating against students too??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>The misguided assumption that many of you are making is that affirmative action gives a place to  unqualified or &quot;underqualified&quot; minorities and this is not the case.  There is a threshold that must be met...that is...does this student meet our basic qualifications threshold(GPA, test scores, essay, recommendation letters, etc).  At that point other factors are then taken into account.  It may be the amount of community service, athletic giftedness, special circumstances (education level of parents, socio-economic status, specific challenges that the student has overcome, for some it is...parents give a lot of money to our school and are alumni and in fewer circumstances race comes into play).  Affirmative action says all other things being equal (not even that every score will be equal, but things are weighted differently) we will use this tool to diversify our student body.  There are thousands of African-American students and Hispanic students who are not accepted to UT Austin and other schools each year as well.  The difference is they don&#039;t sue because they DO NOT FEEL ENTITLED!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The misguided assumption that many of you are making is that affirmative action gives a place to  unqualified or &#8220;underqualified&#8221; minorities and this is not the case.  There is a threshold that must be met&#8230;that is&#8230;does this student meet our basic qualifications threshold(GPA, test scores, essay, recommendation letters, etc).  At that point other factors are then taken into account.  It may be the amount of community service, athletic giftedness, special circumstances (education level of parents, socio-economic status, specific challenges that the student has overcome, for some it is&#8230;parents give a lot of money to our school and are alumni and in fewer circumstances race comes into play).  Affirmative action says all other things being equal (not even that every score will be equal, but things are weighted differently) we will use this tool to diversify our student body.  There are thousands of African-American students and Hispanic students who are not accepted to UT Austin and other schools each year as well.  The difference is they don&#8217;t sue because they DO NOT FEEL ENTITLED!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1720</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1720</guid>
		<description>Priveleged&#039;s comments, &quot;Is admitting based on race the final answer...no, but for now until American society is equal in everyway it will be!&quot; reflects a utopian dream that will never be, has never been, and has ben tried via the communist approach; we all know how that worked out; everyone except the elite few went down to the poverty level; but they were &quot;equal&quot;.  Diversity is divisive and a bunch of PC bull crap.  This nations success, however imperfect it is, is still greater than anything in history at providing the individual the opportunity to succeed on their own initiative, and was achieved by emphasizing our unity as one people, not our diferences and prior cultures.  All the emphasis on our differences is tearing our country apart, NOT bringing us together, and is worsened and prolonged by skin color descrimination for admissions or any other purpose.  Past history will only be past history when it is behind us and not practiced today; this current practice is only making new victims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Priveleged&#8217;s comments, &#8220;Is admitting based on race the final answer&#8230;no, but for now until American society is equal in everyway it will be!&#8221; reflects a utopian dream that will never be, has never been, and has ben tried via the communist approach; we all know how that worked out; everyone except the elite few went down to the poverty level; but they were &#8220;equal&#8221;.  Diversity is divisive and a bunch of PC bull crap.  This nations success, however imperfect it is, is still greater than anything in history at providing the individual the opportunity to succeed on their own initiative, and was achieved by emphasizing our unity as one people, not our diferences and prior cultures.  All the emphasis on our differences is tearing our country apart, NOT bringing us together, and is worsened and prolonged by skin color descrimination for admissions or any other purpose.  Past history will only be past history when it is behind us and not practiced today; this current practice is only making new victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Pinstin</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1719</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Pinstin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1719</guid>
		<description>You can argue lower vs middle vs upper income until you are blue in the face.  Grab every statistic known to man and make the case for affirmative action.  But the problem still remains.  Here is your president who is BLACK and was not privledged:

&quot;When I was young, my family lived in Indonesia for a few years, and my mother didn&#039;t have the money to send me where all the American kids went to school. So she decided to teach me extra lessons herself, Monday through Friday - at 4:30 in the morning. 
Now I wasn&#039;t too happy about getting up that early. A lot of times, I&#039;d fall asleep right there at the kitchen table. But whenever I&#039;d complain, my mother would just give me one of those looks and say, &quot;This is no picnic for me either, buster.&quot;

It is time stop making excuses and to start holding individuals accountable no matter what their situation.  Here is some more of the president&#039;s great speech to school children:

&quot;Where you are right now doesn&#039;t have to determine where you&#039;ll end up. No one&#039;s written your destiny for you. Here in America, you write your own destiny. You make your own future.&quot;

&quot;I know that sometimes, you get the sense from TV that you can be rich and successful without any hard work -- that your ticket to success is through rapping or basketball or being a reality TV star, when chances are, you&#039;re not going to be any of those things. 
But the truth is, being successful is hard. You won&#039;t love every subject you study. You won&#039;t click with every teacher. Not every homework assignment will seem completely relevant to your life right this minute. And you won&#039;t necessarily succeed at everything the first time you try.&quot;

I think this says it all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can argue lower vs middle vs upper income until you are blue in the face.  Grab every statistic known to man and make the case for affirmative action.  But the problem still remains.  Here is your president who is BLACK and was not privledged:</p>
<p>&#8220;When I was young, my family lived in Indonesia for a few years, and my mother didn&#8217;t have the money to send me where all the American kids went to school. So she decided to teach me extra lessons herself, Monday through Friday &#8211; at 4:30 in the morning.<br />
Now I wasn&#8217;t too happy about getting up that early. A lot of times, I&#8217;d fall asleep right there at the kitchen table. But whenever I&#8217;d complain, my mother would just give me one of those looks and say, &#8220;This is no picnic for me either, buster.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is time stop making excuses and to start holding individuals accountable no matter what their situation.  Here is some more of the president&#8217;s great speech to school children:</p>
<p>&#8220;Where you are right now doesn&#8217;t have to determine where you&#8217;ll end up. No one&#8217;s written your destiny for you. Here in America, you write your own destiny. You make your own future.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I know that sometimes, you get the sense from TV that you can be rich and successful without any hard work &#8212; that your ticket to success is through rapping or basketball or being a reality TV star, when chances are, you&#8217;re not going to be any of those things.<br />
But the truth is, being successful is hard. You won&#8217;t love every subject you study. You won&#8217;t click with every teacher. Not every homework assignment will seem completely relevant to your life right this minute. And you won&#8217;t necessarily succeed at everything the first time you try.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this says it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lorac</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1718</link>
		<dc:creator>lorac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1718</guid>
		<description>Kudos to the &#039;silent majority&#039; who rendered opinions.  James Jones, Bill, John Hughes, Justin Calloway, and Bruce McIntosh are to be commended for their insightful comments.  Racism WILL comtinue as long as there is preferential treatment based solely on skin color.  Surely Affirmative Action has been in practice long enough that people understand the concept of rewarding ability and effort- not just race.  It is time for legislation and the courts (which have been legislating instead of adjudicating) to acknowledge that government should be taken out of the equation for the sake of the survival of this nation.  Resentments and revenge will only continue to grow and expand if such situations continue, and this nation will face much worse situations then.  Politics has once again corrupted this society.  It is time for the &#039;silent majority&#039; to hold politicians accountable for their neglect (ignorance?) of the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to the &#8216;silent majority&#8217; who rendered opinions.  James Jones, Bill, John Hughes, Justin Calloway, and Bruce McIntosh are to be commended for their insightful comments.  Racism WILL comtinue as long as there is preferential treatment based solely on skin color.  Surely Affirmative Action has been in practice long enough that people understand the concept of rewarding ability and effort- not just race.  It is time for legislation and the courts (which have been legislating instead of adjudicating) to acknowledge that government should be taken out of the equation for the sake of the survival of this nation.  Resentments and revenge will only continue to grow and expand if such situations continue, and this nation will face much worse situations then.  Politics has once again corrupted this society.  It is time for the &#8216;silent majority&#8217; to hold politicians accountable for their neglect (ignorance?) of the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: privileged</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1717</link>
		<dc:creator>privileged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1717</guid>
		<description>please look at the research before you comment. grad rates for high schools increase from 62.7% for families earning 10K VS 91.5 percent for families earning 75K. (https://www.noellevitz.com/) I can only assume by most of the comments on this board that the writers are mostly middle incoming earning families, probably a lot of Caucasians. That is a terrible assumption I know! 

BUT if I am a minority born to  poorer family (look at stats on birthrates VS income level (http://www.census.gov/) which most are. I then will more than likely go to a lower income school and receive a mediocre education (because of low grad rates thus less students school receive less public funding) So even if I am a good student in that school my scores ACT or SAT might not be as good as another school (higher income/privates/charter....mostly Caucasian dominated)

So should race be a factor...yes it should because diversity is important an we as admissions folks understand that not everyone starts the race on the same line!!!

At the same time our government/schools/us as citizens should be thinking of creative ways to help support students whatever race to achieve. Is admitting based on race the final answer...no, but for now until American society is equal in everyway it will be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please look at the research before you comment. grad rates for high schools increase from 62.7% for families earning 10K VS 91.5 percent for families earning 75K. (<a href="https://www.noellevitz.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.noellevitz.com/</a>) I can only assume by most of the comments on this board that the writers are mostly middle incoming earning families, probably a lot of Caucasians. That is a terrible assumption I know! </p>
<p>BUT if I am a minority born to  poorer family (look at stats on birthrates VS income level (<a href="http://www.census.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://www.census.gov/</a>) which most are. I then will more than likely go to a lower income school and receive a mediocre education (because of low grad rates thus less students school receive less public funding) So even if I am a good student in that school my scores ACT or SAT might not be as good as another school (higher income/privates/charter&#8230;.mostly Caucasian dominated)</p>
<p>So should race be a factor&#8230;yes it should because diversity is important an we as admissions folks understand that not everyone starts the race on the same line!!!</p>
<p>At the same time our government/schools/us as citizens should be thinking of creative ways to help support students whatever race to achieve. Is admitting based on race the final answer&#8230;no, but for now until American society is equal in everyway it will be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>No child or young adult should be left behind it does not matter what your race is and to hold you back because your not protected under the law make every thing this country has work for a sham. and our government a joke. every one has a right to that eduction or no one it can not be it can&#039;t be pick and chose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No child or young adult should be left behind it does not matter what your race is and to hold you back because your not protected under the law make every thing this country has work for a sham. and our government a joke. every one has a right to that eduction or no one it can not be it can&#8217;t be pick and chose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>How is it fair to admit (or deny) anyone from college due to their skin color? 

When it comes to Higher Ed, I feel all individuals that want to go to college should be considered based on their merits. Period. It should absolutely be about working hard and accountability. It would be an interesting study to see the results of college admissions if the students were assigned a number instead of giving their names - then schools could be objective in determining who to accept. 

I also feel that we need to examine how we can improve schools for students from all areas of our country. I think the students are all capable of being successful, but our educational system needs to be improved. Public school education should not discount your ability to move on to Higher Ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it fair to admit (or deny) anyone from college due to their skin color? </p>
<p>When it comes to Higher Ed, I feel all individuals that want to go to college should be considered based on their merits. Period. It should absolutely be about working hard and accountability. It would be an interesting study to see the results of college admissions if the students were assigned a number instead of giving their names &#8211; then schools could be objective in determining who to accept. </p>
<p>I also feel that we need to examine how we can improve schools for students from all areas of our country. I think the students are all capable of being successful, but our educational system needs to be improved. Public school education should not discount your ability to move on to Higher Ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryor</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1712</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1712</guid>
		<description>Congrats, LeTarro, you have bought in to victimhood big time and so can look forward to a life of &#039;oppression&#039; whatever good things may happen to you.  People like you make me wonder what is the point of NOT being prejudiced when you&#039;re going to be branded as such because of your skin color regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats, LeTarro, you have bought in to victimhood big time and so can look forward to a life of &#8216;oppression&#8217; whatever good things may happen to you.  People like you make me wonder what is the point of NOT being prejudiced when you&#8217;re going to be branded as such because of your skin color regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryor</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-6#comment-1711</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1711</guid>
		<description>No great surprise - of course it&#039;s all right to use race, as long as whites don&#039;t benefit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No great surprise &#8211; of course it&#8217;s all right to use race, as long as whites don&#8217;t benefit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce H McIntosh</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-5#comment-1710</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce H McIntosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1710</guid>
		<description>Affirmative Action is based on a fundamentally racist, demeaning premise posited by (at the risk of egregious, blatant stereotyping) rich white northeastern liberal academics.  That premise is that some groups/classes/races are fundamentally incapable of overcoming whatever obstacles are placed before them without the intervention of the government.  The position taken by the proponents of Affirmative Action is, at core, that if you are black in America you are unable to succeed without the government dictating that you be given preferred treatment due solely to the fact that your skin is a different color.  It&#039;s the very essence of racism.

For the white majority, the presence of Affirmative Action policies reinforces the racist notion of incapable minorities by giving the notion the weight of validity backed by the government; if it&#039;s Federal policy then it must be so.  For the black &quot;beneficiary&quot; of Affirmative Action efforts, he must forever wonder if he truly achieved what he achieved on his own merits, or if he was given an easier time of it; furthermore, he must at some level recognize and deeply resent the underlying assumption that he really couldn&#039;t have managed on his own without the kindly hand of Federal intervention just because he&#039;s black.

Maybe the playing field is level and maybe it isn&#039;t.  But until such unutterably improbable future time in which there are no prejudices and biases, let us not pretend that shifting the balance in the the opposite direction is a just or desirable endeavor.  A &quot;fair&quot; society would say &quot;Ok, you had your turn on top, now it&#039;s these other folks&#039; turn to be on top&quot; (or to put it another way, it&#039;s merely a color reversal of Jim Crow, but I hesitate to say that as it might just be too inflammatory).

A truly JUST society on the other hand, would say, &quot;We are giving everybody the same chance, and nobody gets preferential treatment.&quot;  I don&#039;t want to ignore the fact that the deck was stacked against minorities (particularly, given the practice of slavery, the blacks) in the past; but while acknowledging that the nation was wrong let us not fulfill some misbegotten notion that we must in compensation stack the deck in the other direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Affirmative Action is based on a fundamentally racist, demeaning premise posited by (at the risk of egregious, blatant stereotyping) rich white northeastern liberal academics.  That premise is that some groups/classes/races are fundamentally incapable of overcoming whatever obstacles are placed before them without the intervention of the government.  The position taken by the proponents of Affirmative Action is, at core, that if you are black in America you are unable to succeed without the government dictating that you be given preferred treatment due solely to the fact that your skin is a different color.  It&#8217;s the very essence of racism.</p>
<p>For the white majority, the presence of Affirmative Action policies reinforces the racist notion of incapable minorities by giving the notion the weight of validity backed by the government; if it&#8217;s Federal policy then it must be so.  For the black &#8220;beneficiary&#8221; of Affirmative Action efforts, he must forever wonder if he truly achieved what he achieved on his own merits, or if he was given an easier time of it; furthermore, he must at some level recognize and deeply resent the underlying assumption that he really couldn&#8217;t have managed on his own without the kindly hand of Federal intervention just because he&#8217;s black.</p>
<p>Maybe the playing field is level and maybe it isn&#8217;t.  But until such unutterably improbable future time in which there are no prejudices and biases, let us not pretend that shifting the balance in the the opposite direction is a just or desirable endeavor.  A &#8220;fair&#8221; society would say &#8220;Ok, you had your turn on top, now it&#8217;s these other folks&#8217; turn to be on top&#8221; (or to put it another way, it&#8217;s merely a color reversal of Jim Crow, but I hesitate to say that as it might just be too inflammatory).</p>
<p>A truly JUST society on the other hand, would say, &#8220;We are giving everybody the same chance, and nobody gets preferential treatment.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t want to ignore the fact that the deck was stacked against minorities (particularly, given the practice of slavery, the blacks) in the past; but while acknowledging that the nation was wrong let us not fulfill some misbegotten notion that we must in compensation stack the deck in the other direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaTarro</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-5#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>LaTarro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>My friends/family get steaming mad when I say this, but after reading the comments I stand firm in my belief that I really want to be white! I mean, I would give anything to be able to go through life knowing that evry door is open to me, just because of the color of my skin. In addition, to not have the mental burdens that come along with being black. Just to be carefree, and really think that the reason minorities are where they are is because they choose to be. To be blind to the systematic racism and centuries of discrimination that minorities have had to endure in these United States. I even go so far as to ask God &quot;Why did he make me black?&quot; It&#039;s NOT fair! I want the same things everyone else wants out of life, I just don&#039;t understand why I can&#039;t have them. it&#039;s not even about having them, it&#039;s about knowing they&#039;re available to you should you want them. Most minorities are first-generation college students. They&#039;ve never had anyone to tell them about college, so they&#039;re pioneers in essence. But I&#039;ll tell you this, I&#039;d rather be white than a pioneer anyday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friends/family get steaming mad when I say this, but after reading the comments I stand firm in my belief that I really want to be white! I mean, I would give anything to be able to go through life knowing that evry door is open to me, just because of the color of my skin. In addition, to not have the mental burdens that come along with being black. Just to be carefree, and really think that the reason minorities are where they are is because they choose to be. To be blind to the systematic racism and centuries of discrimination that minorities have had to endure in these United States. I even go so far as to ask God &#8220;Why did he make me black?&#8221; It&#8217;s NOT fair! I want the same things everyone else wants out of life, I just don&#8217;t understand why I can&#8217;t have them. it&#8217;s not even about having them, it&#8217;s about knowing they&#8217;re available to you should you want them. Most minorities are first-generation college students. They&#8217;ve never had anyone to tell them about college, so they&#8217;re pioneers in essence. But I&#8217;ll tell you this, I&#8217;d rather be white than a pioneer anyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cally Underwood</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-5#comment-1707</link>
		<dc:creator>Cally Underwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1707</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe race should be considered in any situation.  Why should the color of a person&#039;s skin determine whether or not they get into a particular school or be hired for a certain job?  There is racism among ALL races.  Therefore, when being considered for admission to a university or for employment, RACE should be totally out of the picture.  To consider white, black, brown in admissions or employment as a factor IS DISCRIMINATION...I don&#039;t care how it is sugar-coated.  You can put any excuse out there you want, and there are millions of excuses, but RACISM is RACISM and any time race is considered for school or job opportunities, you can just call it what it is!  If you don&#039;t consider an Asian or African American for a job in a white neighborhood just because everyone is used to looking at white people, then you are a racist.  If a white person goes into a restaurant with all black employees and black patrons are given preferential treatment, then it&#039;s RACISM, people.  Not everyone is a racist and I think progress is being made, but most people still have a long way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe race should be considered in any situation.  Why should the color of a person&#8217;s skin determine whether or not they get into a particular school or be hired for a certain job?  There is racism among ALL races.  Therefore, when being considered for admission to a university or for employment, RACE should be totally out of the picture.  To consider white, black, brown in admissions or employment as a factor IS DISCRIMINATION&#8230;I don&#8217;t care how it is sugar-coated.  You can put any excuse out there you want, and there are millions of excuses, but RACISM is RACISM and any time race is considered for school or job opportunities, you can just call it what it is!  If you don&#8217;t consider an Asian or African American for a job in a white neighborhood just because everyone is used to looking at white people, then you are a racist.  If a white person goes into a restaurant with all black employees and black patrons are given preferential treatment, then it&#8217;s RACISM, people.  Not everyone is a racist and I think progress is being made, but most people still have a long way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-5#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>&quot;People love that “content of their character” quote from MLK and always use it to suggest he was opposed to affirmative action. Wrong. He also recognized that, like it or not, skin color still is an issue, notwithstanding what our laws say. He also said, -“Whenever the issue of compensatory treatment for the Negro is raised, some of our friends recoil in horror. The Negro should be granted equality, they agree; but he should ask for nothing more. On the surface this appears reasonable, but it is not realistic. For it is obvious that if a man is entering the starting line in a race 300 years after another man, the first would have to perform some impossible feat in order to catch up with his fellow runner.”

And this is where MLK was in error, because the Black man is not 300 years behind the white man.  He is equal in every way.  We have a black president.  Blacks have **MORE** opportunities than whites for success because of scholarships and admission policies such as the one mentioned here.

What happens if a University assigns extra admissions weighting in their review process for Asians and Whites to the detriment of Blacks?  How many lawsuits and media blitzes would be hurled into action against such an organization?  You see, if you cannot guarantee equal application of laws, this society will continue to break down.  Promise.

If we cannot treat individuals equally, race warfare will continue to get worse.  I know individuals who received merit-based scholarships from **state-funded** institutions of higher learning (because I work in one) when there were vastly more qualified individuals who were not the same minority they were.  As a result, taxpayer money is funnelled to a race, not to a person strictly based on merit.

Don&#039;t worry, though; our President will make sure that minorities are admitted more easily into medical schools and placed in residencies more easily than their white/caucasian counterparts through incentives to Medical Schools.  As he said himself, &quot;Reparations do not go far enough.&quot;  Get ready to pay for something (past slavery) you don&#039;t support, didn&#039;t do, your family likely didn&#039;t do (since slaveowners were a significant minority).  The President will see that entitlements are expanded based on race, and we will continue to have more heated race relations in this country as a form of reverse discrimination is practiced.

As two young black men yelled at my friend (white) in my city, &quot;It&#039;s our time now.  You had your time.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;People love that “content of their character” quote from MLK and always use it to suggest he was opposed to affirmative action. Wrong. He also recognized that, like it or not, skin color still is an issue, notwithstanding what our laws say. He also said, -“Whenever the issue of compensatory treatment for the Negro is raised, some of our friends recoil in horror. The Negro should be granted equality, they agree; but he should ask for nothing more. On the surface this appears reasonable, but it is not realistic. For it is obvious that if a man is entering the starting line in a race 300 years after another man, the first would have to perform some impossible feat in order to catch up with his fellow runner.”</p>
<p>And this is where MLK was in error, because the Black man is not 300 years behind the white man.  He is equal in every way.  We have a black president.  Blacks have **MORE** opportunities than whites for success because of scholarships and admission policies such as the one mentioned here.</p>
<p>What happens if a University assigns extra admissions weighting in their review process for Asians and Whites to the detriment of Blacks?  How many lawsuits and media blitzes would be hurled into action against such an organization?  You see, if you cannot guarantee equal application of laws, this society will continue to break down.  Promise.</p>
<p>If we cannot treat individuals equally, race warfare will continue to get worse.  I know individuals who received merit-based scholarships from **state-funded** institutions of higher learning (because I work in one) when there were vastly more qualified individuals who were not the same minority they were.  As a result, taxpayer money is funnelled to a race, not to a person strictly based on merit.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry, though; our President will make sure that minorities are admitted more easily into medical schools and placed in residencies more easily than their white/caucasian counterparts through incentives to Medical Schools.  As he said himself, &#8220;Reparations do not go far enough.&#8221;  Get ready to pay for something (past slavery) you don&#8217;t support, didn&#8217;t do, your family likely didn&#8217;t do (since slaveowners were a significant minority).  The President will see that entitlements are expanded based on race, and we will continue to have more heated race relations in this country as a form of reverse discrimination is practiced.</p>
<p>As two young black men yelled at my friend (white) in my city, &#8220;It&#8217;s our time now.  You had your time.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. C. Miki Henderson</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-5#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. C. Miki Henderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>I am a professor at a south Texas university that is more than 95% Latino. However, I have worked at colleges in California that were ethnically diverse and schools in Wisconsin that were more than 95% white. What I have found is that college students are college students regardless of the color of their skin. They are all there to build a life for themselves and they will make similar mistakes and share similar joys and it doesn&#039;t matter what their ethnicity is. Everyone deserves that chance, if they have put the effort into becoming academically prepared for college and can find a way to fund their education.

What gets lost is that college is not a right and no one is entitled to it. It is not compulsory and it is not for everyone. If a high school student does not prepare themselves for college they should not be accepted over someone else who has. It does not matter if they are black, white, purple or green. If one is not prepared to meet the rigorous demands college presents then it is a disservice to the student to place them there before they are ready. It is also disservice to those students who were well prepared, but who were cut out though they could have done well if given the chance.

We would be better off puting our efforts into helping minority students become better prepared for college in the first place so that this isn&#039;t an issue. Instead of looking at college enrollment practices lets look at early education, middle schools, and high schools. We need to strengthen their foundation in education so that this becomes a non-issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a professor at a south Texas university that is more than 95% Latino. However, I have worked at colleges in California that were ethnically diverse and schools in Wisconsin that were more than 95% white. What I have found is that college students are college students regardless of the color of their skin. They are all there to build a life for themselves and they will make similar mistakes and share similar joys and it doesn&#8217;t matter what their ethnicity is. Everyone deserves that chance, if they have put the effort into becoming academically prepared for college and can find a way to fund their education.</p>
<p>What gets lost is that college is not a right and no one is entitled to it. It is not compulsory and it is not for everyone. If a high school student does not prepare themselves for college they should not be accepted over someone else who has. It does not matter if they are black, white, purple or green. If one is not prepared to meet the rigorous demands college presents then it is a disservice to the student to place them there before they are ready. It is also disservice to those students who were well prepared, but who were cut out though they could have done well if given the chance.</p>
<p>We would be better off puting our efforts into helping minority students become better prepared for college in the first place so that this isn&#8217;t an issue. Instead of looking at college enrollment practices lets look at early education, middle schools, and high schools. We need to strengthen their foundation in education so that this becomes a non-issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.E. Dance</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-5#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>M.E. Dance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>The question that I think many people fail to ask is, are the affects of past racist policies still being felt today. That is to say, does a minority today suffer in any way from the injustices that were heaped on his ancestors years ago. If the answer to that question is yes, then that means that a black student and a white student with equal SAT scores and grades are NOT the same because one achieved his position by swimming up stream against the current and the other by floating down stream. I would contend, and I think that evidence overwhelmingly supports this idea, that the affects are still around and minorities are swimming up stream to get to the same position. Justice and decency demands that the nation that created this current do all in it&#039;s power to correct the problem that it created. Like the chemical company that is left with years of clean up after being caught with an illegal dump, the USA is left with the unpleasant job of cleaning up the toxic waste of it&#039;s own racist actions of the past.  People may not like it but we must all take responsibility for our actions even as a nation. We love to ignore our sins and failures but to do so would be to further victimize the victims. What this court and school are trying to do is simply work to clean up the lingering poison that was dumped into the lives of minorities so many years ago and that is still making us sick today. Nuff said</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question that I think many people fail to ask is, are the affects of past racist policies still being felt today. That is to say, does a minority today suffer in any way from the injustices that were heaped on his ancestors years ago. If the answer to that question is yes, then that means that a black student and a white student with equal SAT scores and grades are NOT the same because one achieved his position by swimming up stream against the current and the other by floating down stream. I would contend, and I think that evidence overwhelmingly supports this idea, that the affects are still around and minorities are swimming up stream to get to the same position. Justice and decency demands that the nation that created this current do all in it&#8217;s power to correct the problem that it created. Like the chemical company that is left with years of clean up after being caught with an illegal dump, the USA is left with the unpleasant job of cleaning up the toxic waste of it&#8217;s own racist actions of the past.  People may not like it but we must all take responsibility for our actions even as a nation. We love to ignore our sins and failures but to do so would be to further victimize the victims. What this court and school are trying to do is simply work to clean up the lingering poison that was dumped into the lives of minorities so many years ago and that is still making us sick today. Nuff said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoAnn</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-5#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator>JoAnn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1703</guid>
		<description>I have two questions no one talk about and ignored. 
1. If race is an issue, why the invisible minority is not even mention. Why is that race always a question between Black and White. What happen to the rest of the invisible minority? Why is that I never heard any one complaint about inequality in jobs and education for the invisible minority? Its all come down to politics. The fewer of certain race, the more discrimination opposed on them. History is repeating, the majority wins, the rest can sweep under the carpet.

2. If race is not an issue and people talk about admission should based on good grade and academic standing. Then, how come a invisible minority who have top grade and academic high standard and denied for admission? Because invisible minority has no representation and has no say and because the invisible minorities are insignificant in population. Who cares? 

There is nothing wrong with the universities or college. It is the people who manage it. It is the people who want to have control over the others. It is people who want to have power. It is about people cannot accept others who are different from them. It is people do not accept or believe  people who are not their type of skin better then them. Therefore, politic comes into play. People can say or put in writing anything they want to make things look good, but deep in, things just go the opposite: hidden agenda, minipulation of race card, distortion, and deniel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have two questions no one talk about and ignored.<br />
1. If race is an issue, why the invisible minority is not even mention. Why is that race always a question between Black and White. What happen to the rest of the invisible minority? Why is that I never heard any one complaint about inequality in jobs and education for the invisible minority? Its all come down to politics. The fewer of certain race, the more discrimination opposed on them. History is repeating, the majority wins, the rest can sweep under the carpet.</p>
<p>2. If race is not an issue and people talk about admission should based on good grade and academic standing. Then, how come a invisible minority who have top grade and academic high standard and denied for admission? Because invisible minority has no representation and has no say and because the invisible minorities are insignificant in population. Who cares? </p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with the universities or college. It is the people who manage it. It is the people who want to have control over the others. It is people who want to have power. It is about people cannot accept others who are different from them. It is people do not accept or believe  people who are not their type of skin better then them. Therefore, politic comes into play. People can say or put in writing anything they want to make things look good, but deep in, things just go the opposite: hidden agenda, minipulation of race card, distortion, and deniel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/is-it-ok-to-use-race-in-admissions-court-says-yes/comment-page-5#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=1438#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>Basing decisions of one&#039;s &quot;merit&quot; or potential to achieve in any aspect of life on skin color is a very treacherous walk indeed.  If we are to learn from the mistakes to humanity that occurred in our (and many other countries&#039;) scarred history, then we should recognize that allowing the pendulum of &quot;social justice&quot; to swing wildly, will only perpetuate future injuries to others who carry none of the sins of our past.  Might we, as a society, as a nation, as people, recognize the wisdom to practice fairness as fairness must be.  It is impossible to be &quot;fair&quot; to one person, while subjugating another.  If we acted under this guise, we may well have saved countless taxpayer dollars by not holding up Congress with days of hearings and testimony pertaining to our recent Supreme Court Justice appointment-rather, she would have earned her seat based only on her gender and race, instead of her merit to serve the office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basing decisions of one&#8217;s &#8220;merit&#8221; or potential to achieve in any aspect of life on skin color is a very treacherous walk indeed.  If we are to learn from the mistakes to humanity that occurred in our (and many other countries&#8217;) scarred history, then we should recognize that allowing the pendulum of &#8220;social justice&#8221; to swing wildly, will only perpetuate future injuries to others who carry none of the sins of our past.  Might we, as a society, as a nation, as people, recognize the wisdom to practice fairness as fairness must be.  It is impossible to be &#8220;fair&#8221; to one person, while subjugating another.  If we acted under this guise, we may well have saved countless taxpayer dollars by not holding up Congress with days of hearings and testimony pertaining to our recent Supreme Court Justice appointment-rather, she would have earned her seat based only on her gender and race, instead of her merit to serve the office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.higheredmorning.com @ 2012-02-09 00:30:09 -->
