HigherEdMorning.com » Students lose case, but seek attorneys’ fees

Students lose case, but seek attorneys’ fees

February 13, 2010 by Taylor Hannigan
Posted in: From the Courts, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views

Sure, it hurts to have to pay a lawyer. But are attorneys’ fees a compensable “injury” under the law?

When officials at Texas A&M University got word that members of a student group called the Parsons Mounted Cavalry might be hazing recruits, it initiated disciplinary proceedings against several group members.

The members sued the school in state court, claiming constitutional violations. After a state trial court ruled in their favor and blocked the school from pursuing disciplinary action, they filed another suit against the school – this time in federal court.

That’s when things really got interesting. While the federal suit was pending, the state trial court’s decision was reversed by a state appeals court. The appeals court said the students didn’t suffer an injury because the disciplinary process was never completed.

The federal court then ruled for the school as well, similarly concluding that the students never really suffered an injury. By that time, the students had all graduated.

The students filed an appeal in the federal case, saying they did suffer an injury in that they paid attorneys’ fees. The threat of discipline left them no choice but to sue, they argued.

A federal appeals court rejected their appeal. Parties who voluntarily sue and lose cannot later sue to recover their attorneys’ fees as a compensable injury, it decided.

Cite: Hole v. Texas A&M University.

  • Share/Bookmark

HigherEdMorning delivers the latest HigherEd news once a week to the inboxes of over 200,000 HigherEd professionals.

Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to HigherEdMorning!

Tags: , ,

One Response to “Students lose case, but seek attorneys’ fees”

  1. Bill Says:

    Excuse me?!?! Since when is hazing a constitutional right? The facts are a little slim here, but it says only that disciplinary proceedings were initiated. That could mean an investigation was started. I believe it is not only a right, but a duty, of every school to investigate possible hazing violations. Most such investigations can easily be handled with meetings between the administration and the student organization. If the issue is serious enough that they have to get attorneys involved then the students have probably already violated SOMEONE ELSE’S rights. Why is it so hard for some people to understand that hazing is just wrong on every level?

Leave a Reply


advertisement



    Quick Vote

    • Which best describes your political leanings?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...



  • advertisement


    Recent Popular Articles