HigherEdMorning.com » Was admission denial based on gender?

Was admission denial based on gender?

January 16, 2010 by Taylor Hannigan
Posted in: From the Courts, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views

It’s usually pretty tough for applicants to prove they were denied admission based on gender. But there are exceptions.

Kimberly Tingley-Kelley applied to the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine six times between 2002 and 2007. Her grades and GRE scores were on the low end of the range accepted by the school, but she was denied admission each time she applied.

Tingley-Kelley sued the school, claiming it denied her admission based on her gender and because she was a woman with young children and a husband in the military.

To support her claims, she pointed to her application review form, on which admissions committee members noted “concerns about how she’ll do in school esp. w/family, etc.” Another note pointed out that she’d be at school with two young children, while a third said Tingley-Kelley would have “a tough row to hoe.”

Tingley-Kelley also said her childcare responsibilities were discussed at length during admissions interviews.

This was all direct evidence that admissions committee members considered her status as a mother with young children and a spouse in the military when they chose to deny her admission, the court said. Therefore, it refused to grant summary judgment to the school on the discrimination claim.

Cite: Tingley-Kelley v. Trustees of the Univ. of Pennsylvania.

Have a comment on this story? Please share it below.

  • Share/Bookmark

HigherEdMorning delivers the latest HigherEd news once a week to the inboxes of over 200,000 HigherEd professionals.

Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to HigherEdMorning!

Tags: , , ,

3 Responses to “Was admission denial based on gender?”

  1. tt Says:

    good for her

  2. Furry animal Says:

    How does the story end? Did she go to Penn or elsewhere? What’s she doing today?

  3. Texas DJ Says:

    Hrmmmm….? I don’t know about the gender argument. That’s not to say that she might not still have a case for other reasons, but I don’t think she has a strong leg to stand on with the gender issue.

    The “life factors” referenced, namely having children and having a spouse in the military, could easily apply to either gender. Seems to me that the discrimination case would have to be made more on the angle that the school’s admissions committee were factoring in the degree or likelihood of success in determining admissions qualifications. And I don’t know enough about “that” to know if that’s lawful or not.

    I’d be interested to hear the eventual outcome of this issue.

Leave a Reply


advertisement



    Quick Vote

    • Do you feel ready for the start of another school year?

      • Absolutely (63%, 10 Votes)
      • I'm almost there (19%, 3 Votes)
      • No way I'll be ready in time (18%, 3 Votes)

      Total Voters: 16

      Loading ... Loading ...



  • advertisement


    Higher Ed Jobs

    Recent Popular Articles