<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was admission denial based on gender?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.higheredmorning.com/was-admission-denial-based-on-gender/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/was-admission-denial-based-on-gender</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/was-admission-denial-based-on-gender/comment-page-1#comment-5741</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3424#comment-5741</guid>
		<description>Hrmmmm....?  I don&#039;t know about the gender argument.  That&#039;s not to say that she might not still have a case for other reasons, but I don&#039;t think she has a strong leg to stand on with the gender issue.

The &quot;life factors&quot; referenced, namely having children and having a spouse in the military, could easily apply to either gender.  Seems to me that the discrimination case would have to be made more on the angle that the school&#039;s admissions committee were factoring in the degree or likelihood of success in determining admissions qualifications.  And I don&#039;t know enough about &quot;that&quot; to know if that&#039;s lawful or not.  

I&#039;d be interested to hear the eventual outcome of this issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hrmmmm&#8230;.?  I don&#8217;t know about the gender argument.  That&#8217;s not to say that she might not still have a case for other reasons, but I don&#8217;t think she has a strong leg to stand on with the gender issue.</p>
<p>The &#8220;life factors&#8221; referenced, namely having children and having a spouse in the military, could easily apply to either gender.  Seems to me that the discrimination case would have to be made more on the angle that the school&#8217;s admissions committee were factoring in the degree or likelihood of success in determining admissions qualifications.  And I don&#8217;t know enough about &#8220;that&#8221; to know if that&#8217;s lawful or not.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to hear the eventual outcome of this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Furry animal</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/was-admission-denial-based-on-gender/comment-page-1#comment-5273</link>
		<dc:creator>Furry animal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3424#comment-5273</guid>
		<description>How does the story end? Did she go to Penn or elsewhere? What&#039;s she doing today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the story end? Did she go to Penn or elsewhere? What&#8217;s she doing today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tt</title>
		<link>http://www.higheredmorning.com/was-admission-denial-based-on-gender/comment-page-1#comment-5250</link>
		<dc:creator>tt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.higheredmorning.com/?p=3424#comment-5250</guid>
		<description>good for her</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good for her</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.higheredmorning.com @ 2012-02-08 23:09:46 -->
