HigherEdMorning.com » Was sanction on fraternity too harsh?

Was sanction on fraternity too harsh?

September 26, 2009 by Taylor Hannigan
Posted in: From the Courts, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views

What do you think the penalty should be for a fraternity that furnished alcohol to minors and engaged in drug use and distribution?

Washington State University revoked its recognition of the Alpha Kappa Lambda fraternity for five years after finding the fraternity had:

  • Failed to have a resident advisor live in its chapter house
  • Failed to properly register social functions
  • Furnished alcohol to minors, and
  • Been involved in drug-related activity, including the sale of cocaine.

The fraternity sued the university, saying the school’s findings weren’t supported by enough evidence. It also argued the sanction was too harsh.

The court disagreed. It OK’d the university’s consideration of testimony from confidential informants. And it said there was plenty of evidence supporting the school’s decision to hold the fraternity accountable for the illegal actions of its officers, members and guests. In addition to the confidential informant testimony, that evidence included photos of a drug dealer and an underage drinker.

The sanction was reasonable in light of the evidence, the court said.

Cite: Alpha Kappa Lambda Fraternity v. Washington State University.

Have a comment on this story? Please share it below.

  • Share/Bookmark

HigherEdMorning delivers the latest HigherEd news once a week to the inboxes of over 200,000 HigherEd professionals.

Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to HigherEdMorning!

Tags: , ,

5 Responses to “Was sanction on fraternity too harsh?”

  1. bOB Says:

    tOO BAD!

  2. EDB Says:

    The fraternity should be permanently shut down.

  3. Jim Says:

    HMmm, how about some jail time for someone then?

  4. Hank Walker Says:

    Think about the liability, bad PR and failure in its mission if Washington State knew this was going on and continued to recognize the frat. Based on my knowledge of frat suspensions, a five-year suspension seems reasonable for this situation.

  5. EE Says:

    Any WSU students involved – kicked out of school permanently with explanation on their permanent record

    Anyone involved in the distribution of alcohol or drugs to minors should be subject to prosecution to the full extent of the criminal law as well as subject to civil suits by parents on behalf of their victimized children

    Fraternity permanently banned from WSU

    There’s got to be a message that there are serious consequences to breaking the law!

Leave a Reply


advertisement



    Quick Vote

    • Which best describes your political leanings?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...



  • advertisement


    Recent Popular Articles