HigherEdMorning.com » Work ‘prayer meeting’ leads to dismissals, lawsuit

Work ‘prayer meeting’ leads to dismissals, lawsuit

August 10, 2010 by Taylor Hannigan
Posted in: From the Courts, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views

After performing a prayer ritual that bordered on an exorcism, two university employees were fired. Then they sued.

Doug Maples and Evelyn Knight, co-workers at the University of Texas at Arlington, didn’t always get along. In fact, Maples once brought Knight to tears in front of other co-workers, calling her “a really mean person.”

Two of those other co-workers were Evelyne Shatkin and Linda Shiflett, and they also had trouble working with Knight.

Shatkin and Maples came up with a plan: One day after work, when Knight was not around, they would go to Knight’s cubicle and pray. Shifflett liked the idea enough to join them.

One day after work, at about 5:30, the three met at Knight’s cubicle to pray. Shatkin apparently led the ritual, rubbing olive oil on the doorway to Knight’s cubicle and loudly commanding the “vicious evil dogs” to “get the hell out.”

When a supervisor got wind of the get-together, Shatkin and Shifflett were fired. They’ve sued, claiming discrimination based on their religious beliefs.

In the latest development in the case, the court denied the university’s motion for pretrial judgment. At this stage of the case, the pair have presented enough evidence of religious bias to go forward with their claims, and  it’s not clear whether they were let go because of their religious beliefs.

Cite: Shatkin v. University of Texas at Arlington.

What do you think of this case? Tell us below.

  • Share/Bookmark

HigherEdMorning delivers the latest HigherEd news once a week to the inboxes of over 200,000 HigherEd professionals.

Click here to sign up and start your FREE subscription to HigherEdMorning!

Tags: , ,

2 Responses to “Work ‘prayer meeting’ leads to dismissals, lawsuit”

  1. Upton O'Goode Says:

    If the article’s description of the events is correct, then the two do seem to be victims of religious discrimination, based on the statement, “When a supervisor got wind …” If they were, in fact, fired because a supervisor learned that they had prayed for a coworker, then they were clearly discriminated against.

  2. Texian Says:

    Yeah, they should have been fired, not just two, but all three.

    They were practicing their “religion” at the workplace in someone else’s space. Allowing this kind of “ceremony” would give them the right to do this any and every where at the job site. And acceptance would have meant any sect could practice their religious rites at the work place. That would have ticked the “witches” off had anyone done the same for their space.

    But most of all, these folks are just too dumb to be paid with my taxpayer dollars.

Leave a Reply


advertisement



    Quick Vote

    • Which best describes your political leanings?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...



  • advertisement


    Recent Popular Articles